On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 03:38:17PM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > Perhaps it's just me, but I don't see a problem yet. If Perl were > somehow being "taken over", then I expect the Perl community (at the > very least, one David Grove :-) to be up in arms about it. And then they could fork, and Perl would stay free. Crisis over. IT'S OPEN SOURCE. David, go understand what that means. -- IBM: It may be slow, but it's hard to use.
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Nathan Torkington
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Nathan Wiger
- Re: Continued RFC process Piers Cawley
- Re: Continued RFC process Stephen Zander
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- Re: Continued RFC process Simon Cozens
- Re: Continued RFC process Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Continued RFC process Simon Cozens
- Re: Continued RFC process Piers Cawley
- RE: Continued RFC process Bryan C . Warnock
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- Re: Continued RFC process Will Coleda - IMG
- David's paranoia again (was Re: Continued RFC pro... Randal L. Schwartz
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- RE: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process John Porter
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- Re: Continued RFC process J. David Blackstone