On Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:00 PM Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 18:14, AmirBehzad Eslami wrote: > > But don't you think shape of U+066C is very similar to sign of 'foot' > > and 'minute'? > > (http://students.washington.edu/irina/persianword/afgDecSep.JPG) > > Depends on the font. Compare with > <http://www.bamdad.org/~roozbeh/thsep.png>, for example. > > roozbeh Roozbeh, Thank you very much for that screen-shot. Ok. I admit it; Lab-beyk Yaa U+066C ;-) But as Connie mentioned, some users are unable to see this character correctly. I wonder even the Nesf2 has a bug about this U+066C. So, If I don't like to use U+066C (because of Web-Usability reasons), Is there an alternative for me? May I use the 'Reh' until most of users have standard systems? If your answer is No, I have two more options: 1. Forget to separate numbers (Paak kardan-e soorat mas-aleh) 2. Ask my website visitors to download a newer version of Tahoma (What about the font Nesf?) A) Does any body have a better option? B) What is this "Arabic Decimal Separator (U+066B)? Thanks in advance, Behzad _______________________________________________ PersianComputing mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing
