And remember the problem is only happening when the request is made from Vista.. So I think its something right down at 'packet level', the way modjk sends and vistas tcp stack acknowledges..

I'm going to see if the latest stable modjk makes any difference but maybe someone can correct me here, It seems to be only available for apache 2.2, not apache 2.0. I'll have to wait till early tomorrow before trying it when theres no users on my sites, I dont want to risk making a balls of everything.

rgds,

Dave

Richard Forth wrote:


On 18/04/07, *David Brown* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    If I make the request direct to tomcat, i.e. via port 8080 its fine.
    Everything else delivered on the site via modjk has been ok, just
    this
    one jsp. Which leads me to think there is something in the content
    which
    is screwing with modjk.   The content in question is a load of user
    details, but in an encrypted form so it looks like garbled text. Just
    one long string of garbled text. About 50k worth.

    Strange eh ?

Yes that is wierd, sounds like you are doing everything correctly then, I would be inclined to rebuild the rogue JSP, and testing it as you go, until it falls over again, like you say sounds like some dodgy code in the page pity it is encrypted data. Maybe thats why it works over https not http? Could you not just do a dirty fix and link to it via HTTPS? Sorry like I said im not much of an expert, but I think if you want to get to the bottom of this one you will have to play with the JSP code bit by bit, trial and error, until it falls over. You never know it might be fixed by just rebuilding the page. then again, maybe not if it already works under HTTPS...hmmm sorry........... thinking as I type again.. */Which leads me to think there is something in the content which
is screwing with modjk./*
I agree actually. Now i have thought about it. Mod_JK is just a connector between Apache services and Tomcat services, and presuming, as you say, that other JSP pages work fine, then I think you are right, you need to look at the page content. Hope this helps, and keep us informed of your progress.

Regards
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro


_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

Reply via email to