Hi, On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, I agree... but there may be scripts for warm-standby based on >> the existing default behavior. So, I didn't make a new trigger the default. > > I don't use pg_standby personnaly but I admit I'm quite surprised by > the current behaviour. I'm pretty sure a lot of the current users > would be surprised too.
The current behavior is documented as follows, so it may be taken for granted by some users. I think that we shouldn't ignore such users. --------------- Specify a trigger file whose presence should cause recovery to end whether or not the next WAL file is available. --------------- Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
