>>> Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, I agree... but there may be scripts for warm-standby based on >> the existing default behavior. So, I didn't make a new trigger the default. > > I don't use pg_standby personnaly but I admit I'm quite surprised by > the current behaviour. I'm pretty sure a lot of the current users > would be surprised too. I find it hard to imagine a use case for the existing default behavior. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
