On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > I find it hard to imagine a use case for the existing default > behavior.
I thought a bit about it and I think it can be useful when your priority is the availability of the service and you don't consider a data loss that important: even if you have a lot of WALs segments to replay, you may want to have your service up immediately in case of a major problem. Keeping it is a good idea IMHO but I don't think it should be the default. -- Guillaume -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
