Hi, On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kevin Grittner > <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: >> I find it hard to imagine a use case for the existing default >> behavior. > > I thought a bit about it and I think it can be useful when your > priority is the availability of the service and you don't consider a > data loss that important: even if you have a lot of WALs segments to > replay, you may want to have your service up immediately in case of a > major problem.
Yes, I also think that this is likely use case. > Keeping it is a good idea IMHO but I don't think it should be the default. What does "the default" mean? You mean that new trigger should use the existing trigger option character (-t)? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
