Hi Simon. On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Earlier, we discussed having a single trigger file that contains an > option rather than two distinct trigger files. That design is better > because it allows the user to choose at failover time, rather than > making a binding decision at config time. That solution would be the > ideal one, IMHO, because it gives user more choice - and would allow us > to keep the -t option meaningfully. In that case the default should be > patience.
Or you can define both files in your command line to have the choice. I like the idea of removing -t and adding 2 new options so that people are warned about the intended behavior. Anyway, I don't have a strong opinion about how we should fix it as I don't use pg_standby personnally, just that we should. The two options you mention have their own merits. -- Guillaume -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
