Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO, the current ADD COLUMN mechanism is a hack. Besides requiring
> redundant on-disk data (t_natts), it isn't SQL compliant (because
> default values or NOT NULL can't be specified), and depends on
> a low-level kludge (that the storage system will return NULL for
> any attnums > the # of the attributes stored in the tuple).
It could be improved if anyone felt like working on it.
Hint: instead of returning NULL for col > t_natts, you could instead
return whatever default value is specified for the column... at least
for the case of a constant default, which is the main thing people
are interested in IMHO.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
