I said: > Sorry, you used up your chance at claiming that t_hoff is dispensable. > If we apply your already-submitted patch, it isn't.
Wait, I take that back. t_hoff is important to distinguish how much bitmap padding there is on a particular tuple --- but that's really only interesting as long as we aren't forcing dump/initdb/reload. If we are changing anything else about tuple headers, then that argument becomes irrelevant anyway. However, I'm still concerned about losing safety margin by removing "redundant" fields. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])