On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 10:35 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > > Frankly, if Simon hadn't already submitted code, I'd be pushing for > > single-standby-only for 9.1, instead of "any one". > > Yes, we are awfully late, but let's not panic.
Yes, we're about a year late. Getting a simple feature like this into the code could have been done in 9.0. We must stop returning to overcomplex features, especially if they aren't backed up with solid analysis of things like server availability and query visibility. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
