On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:53, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4c80d9b8.2020...@enterprisedb.com >> >> That just needs to be polished into shape, and documentation.
I have an updated version of this somewhere.IIRC it also needs things like tablespace support, ubt it's well on it's way. > Wow, cool! I don't know how but I've missed it. Yes, especially since we discussed it in Stuttgart. I guess it may have been during the party... >> +1. Or maybe it would be better make it a separate binary, rather than part >> of pg_ctl. > > Well the thinking was that nowadays we support initdb from pg_ctl, and > this is another kind of initdb, really. Yes, if it should go in any of the current binaries, initdb would be the reasonable place, not pg_ctl ;) That said, if we're going to wrap pg_streamrecv into 9.1 (which I think we should), then *that* is where it should go. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
