Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4c80d9b8.2020...@enterprisedb.com > > That just needs to be polished into shape, and documentation.
Wow, cool! I don't know how but I've missed it. > +1. Or maybe it would be better make it a separate binary, rather than part > of pg_ctl. Well the thinking was that nowadays we support initdb from pg_ctl, and this is another kind of initdb, really. > I linked above. Running queries requires connecting to a real database, > which means that the user needs to have privileges to do that and you need > to know the name of a valid database. Ideally this would all work through a > replication connection. I think we should go with that from day one. I didn't think about the "connecting to a real database" part of it, versus using a dedicated REPLICATION connection/protocol, and to be honest, I feared it was too much work. Seeing that you already did it, though, +1. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
