> What about the HBA here? Hmmm. That's tempting; an "synchronous" HBA instead of a GUC? But that doesn't solve the problem of "standby #6 is failing, I want to kick it off synch rep".
I'd be opposed to having a GUC *and* an HBA. making DBAs set things independantly in two places just frustrates our users. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers