> What about the HBA here?

Hmmm.  That's tempting; an "synchronous" HBA instead of a GUC?  But that
doesn't solve the problem of "standby #6 is failing, I want to kick it
off synch rep".

I'd be opposed to having a GUC *and* an HBA.  making DBAs set things
independantly in two places just frustrates our users.

--Josh

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to