Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:06 PM, "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> > wrote: >> I have a suspicion that we might sometimes find the information >> conveyed by the detail useful when responding to users with >> questions; but the language as it stands seems confusing for users.
> I think removing info here or making it harder to get would be a mistake. Agreed. If we can clarify the messages, and/or make sure the terminology they use is documented, that'd be a good thing; but let's not just remove them. I think that Peter's real concern is whether these are worth translating, and I share that doubt. Perhaps we should invent an errdetail_internal, parallel to errmsg_internal, that works like errdetail but doesn't treat the message as a candidate for translation? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers