Robert Haas <> writes:
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:06 PM, "Kevin Grittner" <> 
> wrote:
>> I have a suspicion that we might sometimes find the information
>> conveyed by the detail useful when responding to users with
>> questions; but the language as it stands seems confusing for users.

> I think removing info here or making it harder to get would be a mistake.

Agreed.  If we can clarify the messages, and/or make sure the
terminology they use is documented, that'd be a good thing; but let's
not just remove them.

I think that Peter's real concern is whether these are worth
translating, and I share that doubt.  Perhaps we should invent an
errdetail_internal, parallel to errmsg_internal, that works like
errdetail but doesn't treat the message as a candidate for translation?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to