Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar sep 20 10:51:51 -0300 2011: > On sön, 2011-09-18 at 12:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > > On sön, 2011-09-18 at 09:45 -0500, Dave Page wrote: > > >> That is much more reasonable, though unfortunately not what was said. > > >> Regardless, I stand by my main point that such a representative should > > >> be communicating with the project regularly. Having a rep who works > > >> outside the project is of no use at all. > > > > > Well, the point of this thread is, how can she communicate? > > > > +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do such > > a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for > > appropriate purposes. > > Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago. The blocking > issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where to put it (I'm > looking at you, pgfoundry).
I don't see why we wouldn't put it in @postgresql.org. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
