On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:51:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On sön, 2011-09-18 at 12:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > > On sön, 2011-09-18 at 09:45 -0500, Dave Page wrote: > > >> That is much more reasonable, though unfortunately not what was said. > > >> Regardless, I stand by my main point that such a representative should > > >> be communicating with the project regularly. Having a rep who works > > >> outside the project is of no use at all. > > > > > Well, the point of this thread is, how can she communicate? > > > > +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do such > > a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for > > appropriate purposes. > > Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago. The blocking > issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where to put it (I'm > looking at you, pgfoundry). > > > I guess the real question is, exactly what will be the requirements > > for joining? > > As as far as I'm concerned, anyone who is known in the community and has > a plausible interest can join. The requirement is that we share this > material with "colleagues" for consultation, as opposed to posting it on > the public internet.
I'd like to be on this list, and believe I qualify. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
