Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié sep 21 00:27:53 -0300 2011: > > On tis, 2011-09-20 at 11:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do > > > > such a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed > > > > lists for appropriate purposes. > > > > > > Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago. The > > > blocking issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where > > > to put it (I'm looking at you, pgfoundry). > > > > I don't see why we wouldn't put it in @postgresql.org. > > One nice thing about pgfoundry would be the document manager. Also, at > least at some point in the past, a pgfoundry project was easier to > manage than getting anything done about a @postgresql.org mailing list.
The document manager might be useful, true. I cannot speak about past administrators of the Majordomo installation that serves the @postgresql.org lists, though. For all intents and purposes, it seems I'm in charge of it now. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
