On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié sep 21 00:27:53 -0300 2011: >> >> On tis, 2011-09-20 at 11:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> > > > +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do >> > > > such a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed >> > > > lists for appropriate purposes. >> > > >> > > Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago. The >> > > blocking issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where >> > > to put it (I'm looking at you, pgfoundry). >> > >> > I don't see why we wouldn't put it in @postgresql.org. >> >> One nice thing about pgfoundry would be the document manager. Also, at >> least at some point in the past, a pgfoundry project was easier to >> manage than getting anything done about a @postgresql.org mailing list. > > The document manager might be useful, true. I cannot speak about past > administrators of the Majordomo installation that serves the > @postgresql.org lists, though. For all intents and purposes, it seems > I'm in charge of it now.
Only "seems"? :-) -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
