On 30/08/12 17:36, Tom Lane wrote: > FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old. I'm not sure > that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be > used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is > openjade, or really the original project.
It was the old jade. After I installed openjade, as suggested by Alvaro and Jeff Janes, and re-ran ./configure the invocation line changed to use openjade. Joe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
