On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joe Abbate <j...@freedomcircle.com> wrote: > On 30/08/12 17:36, Tom Lane wrote: >> FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old. I'm not sure >> that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be >> used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is >> openjade, or really the original project. > > It was the old jade. After I installed openjade, as suggested by Alvaro > and Jeff Janes, and re-ran ./configure the invocation line changed to > use openjade. >
so, now the question is: should we accept jade at all in configure? or should we fail after not finding jade and report why? -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
