On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joe Abbate <j...@freedomcircle.com> wrote: >> On 30/08/12 17:36, Tom Lane wrote: >>> FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old. I'm not sure >>> that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be >>> used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is >>> openjade, or really the original project. >> >> It was the old jade. After I installed openjade, as suggested by Alvaro >> and Jeff Janes, and re-ran ./configure the invocation line changed to >> use openjade. >> > > so, now the question is: should we accept jade at all in configure? or > should we fail after not finding jade and report why? >
the last one should read "openjade" ;) -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
