On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Phil Sorber escribió: >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Maybe. But I'm not inclined to add new libpq interface at this stage. >> > Because we are in the last CommitFest and I'm not sure whether >> > we have enough time to implement that. Instead, how about using >> > both PQconninfoParse() and PQconndefaults() like uri-regress.c does? >> > Or just remove that output message? At least I don't think that the >> > information about host and port needs to be output. Which would make >> > the code very simpler. >> >> I think that output is important as do others up thread. I think it'd >> be simpler to just disable dbname's ability to double as conninfo. If >> we are looking for easy, that is. >> >> I don't mind duplicating the behavior from conninfo_array_parse() or >> uri-regress.c either. I can just put a comment that at some point in >> the future we should add a libpq interface for it. > > I suggest duplicate the code for 9.3, and submit a patch to refactor > into a new libpq function for CF2013-next. If the patch is simple > enough, we can consider putting it into 9.3.
Agreed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
