On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber <p...@omniti.com> wrote:
>> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
>> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure
>> it will get plenty of debate on it's own.
>
> I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for us vs. the existing coding?
>

It's supposed to handle the connection string passed as dbname case to
be able to get the right output for host:port. It works, but I don't
really like it all that much, honestly. I also submitted a patch to
add on to libpq to handle this, but Alvaro posed some questions I
don't have good answers for. So I actually have another patch brewing
that I actually like, but I need to put the finishing touches on. I
plan on submitting that later this morning.

> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to