Phil Sorber escribió: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe. But I'm not inclined to add new libpq interface at this stage. > > Because we are in the last CommitFest and I'm not sure whether > > we have enough time to implement that. Instead, how about using > > both PQconninfoParse() and PQconndefaults() like uri-regress.c does? > > Or just remove that output message? At least I don't think that the > > information about host and port needs to be output. Which would make > > the code very simpler. > > I think that output is important as do others up thread. I think it'd > be simpler to just disable dbname's ability to double as conninfo. If > we are looking for easy, that is. > > I don't mind duplicating the behavior from conninfo_array_parse() or > uri-regress.c either. I can just put a comment that at some point in > the future we should add a libpq interface for it.
I suggest duplicate the code for 9.3, and submit a patch to refactor into a new libpq function for CF2013-next. If the patch is simple enough, we can consider putting it into 9.3. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
