On 2/8/13 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their >> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If >> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes. > > I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds > like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo > somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would > make me sad. The list archives are this project's community memory, > and I have every expectation that they'll still be around and useful > when Gerrit is forgotten. I don't object to people using their > tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making > sure that the reviews get archived.
Gerrit sends me an email every times something happens, so I think this is not going to be a problem. What it doesn't support AFAICT is sending emails *in*, but I don't see that as a requirement. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
