Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On 2/8/13 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... I don't object to people using their
>> tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
>> sure that the reviews get archived.
> Gerrit sends me an email every times something happens, so I think this
> is not going to be a problem.
As long as it can be persuaded to mail the text of reviews (not just a
notification), that'd probably be all right.
> What it doesn't support AFAICT is sending emails *in*, but I don't see
> that as a requirement.
Meh. Many of the complaints about the current CF application boil down
to the fact that it doesn't accept email input, so I'm not really
convinced that a different tool that also doesn't accept email input
is going to be a big step forward.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
