On 8 February 2013 10:23, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>> to solve two problems: >> >> 1. maximize the efficiency of existing reviewer time >> >> 2. make tooling not be an obstacle to getting new reviewers > > I think you are missing a fundamental part in this - which is "0. > don't negatively affect the efficiency of existing committer time". Agreed. Process improvement is very important, but not more important than the process itself. What is the developer meeting for if not this discussion? Let's do some patch reviews and commits now and save the lets-make-it-better stufff for later. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
