Jeff Janes escribió:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> 8. Send it to pgsql-hackers
> >> 8.a. this requires you to be subscribed to pgsql-hackers.
> >
> > No, it does not. It will get caught in the moderation queue and get
> > slightly delayed if you're not, but it works perfectly fine.
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/bug-reporting.html
> 
> "Note: Due to the unfortunate amount of spam going around, all of the
> above email addresses are closed mailing lists. That is, you need to
> be subscribed to a list to be allowed to post on it."
> 
> Is this wrong, or just strategically over-simplified?

Well, it is factually wrong, because the moderators will see such
requests and approve them.  And the parenthical remark following the
quoted part is wrong too, in a sense, because even though using the form
does not require you to be subscribed, the report will not be posted
until a moderator approves it; so it has the same problem.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to