On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Stephen Scheck > <singularsyn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Many of the links in the TODO wiki page result in a "page not found" error. >> Is this page up-to-date? >> Can anything be inferred about the status of these items from the broken >> link? > > I think what we can infer is that the new archives code is broken. I > hope someone is planning to fix that. If there's been some decision
Yes. We can infer that. It makes it a whole lot easier to fix something with better bug repors than that, of course, as I'm sure you (Robert in this case, not Stephen) are generally aware of. I've reverted a patch that was applied a few days ago that dealt with how URLs are parsed, and I think that's the one that's responsible. But it would be good to have an actual example of what didn't work, because the links i tried all worked... > made that we don't have to support the historical URLs for our > archives pages, I think that's a really bad plan; those links are in a > lot more places than just the Todo. No, the plan has always been to support those. There are no plans to remove that. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
