On Apr26, 2013, at 10:28 , Ants Aasma <ants.aa...@eesti.ee> wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2013 10:38 PM, "Jeff Davis" <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 11:44 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
> > > I will try to reword.
> >
> > Did you have a chance to clarify this, as well as some of the other
> > documentation issues Simon mentioned here?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+U5nMKVEu8UDXQe
> > +Nk=d7nqm4ypfszaef0esak4j31lyqc...@mail.gmail.com
> Not yet. I am busy at the moment due to events in private life. I might be 
> able to find some time over the weekend to go over the documentation but no 
> guarantees.

I can try to write up the reasoning behind the choice of FNV1+SHIFT3 as a 
checksum function, but I'm quite busy too so I'm not 100% certain I'll get to 
it. If that's OK with you Ants, that is.

> > I'm not sure if others are waiting on me for a new patch or not. I can
> > give the documentation issues a try, but I was hesitant to do so because
> > you've done the research.
> >
> > The problems that I can correct are fairly trivial.
> The unresolved code issue that I know of is moving the compiler flags behind 
> a configure check. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at 
> that. My config-fu is weak and it would take me some time to figure out how 
> to do that.

Do we necessarily have to do that before beta? If not, let's concentrate on 
getting the basic path in, and let's add the gcc-specific compiler options 

best regards,
Florian Pflug

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to