On 26 April 2013 14:40, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> On 2013-04-26 13:11:00 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>>>> The unresolved code issue that I know of is moving the compiler flags 
>>>> behind a configure check. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take 
>>>> a look at that. My config-fu is weak and it would take me some time to 
>>>> figure out how to do that.
>>> Do we necessarily have to do that before beta? If not, let's concentrate on 
>>> getting the basic path in, and let's add the gcc-specific compiler options 
>>> later.
>> If we want them we should do it before beta, otherwise we won't notice
>> problems that the flags cause (misoptimizations, problems on compiler
>> versions, ...). So either now or in 9.4.
> Yeah, beta1 is the point in the cycle where we have the most leverage
> for discovering portability problems.  We should not be leaving anything
> involving configure tests as "to fix later".

I'm expecting to spend some time on this over the weekend, once I've
re-read the thread and patches to see if there is something to commit.

That's my last time window, so this looks like the last chance to make
changes before beta.

 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to