On 2/12/14, 4:30 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly.
>> Would that be affected by this?
> 
> I don't think we have real infrastructure for that yet. Neither from the POV 
> of loading several .so's, nor from a symbol visibility. Afaics we'd need a 
> working definition of PGDLLIMPORT which inverts the declspecs. I think Tom 
> just removed the remnants of that.

It works reasonably well on other platforms.

Of course, we can barely build extension modules on Windows, so maybe
this is a bit much to ask.  But as long as we're dealing only with
functions, not variables, it should work without any dllimport dances,
right?



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to