On 2/12/14, 4:30 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly. >> Would that be affected by this? > > I don't think we have real infrastructure for that yet. Neither from the POV > of loading several .so's, nor from a symbol visibility. Afaics we'd need a > working definition of PGDLLIMPORT which inverts the declspecs. I think Tom > just removed the remnants of that.
Advertising
It works reasonably well on other platforms. Of course, we can barely build extension modules on Windows, so maybe this is a bit much to ask. But as long as we're dealing only with functions, not variables, it should work without any dllimport dances, right? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
