On February 12, 2014 10:35:06 PM CET, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >Andres Freund <[email protected]> writes: >> On February 12, 2014 10:23:21 PM CET, Peter Eisentraut ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another >directly. >>> Would that be affected by this? > >> I don't think we have real infrastructure for that yet. Neither from >the POV of loading several .so's, nor from a symbol visibility. Afaics >we'd need a working definition of PGDLLIMPORT which inverts the >declspecs. I think Tom just removed the remnants of that. > >No, I've not touched the PGDLLIMPORT macros. I was hoping to, but it >looks like we're not getting there :-(
Right, that was just the test patch... Then the macros we're using in fmgr.h for the magic macros (even if not strictly needed) should work for Peter's case. Andres -- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
