Andres Freund <> writes:
> On February 12, 2014 10:23:21 PM CET, Peter Eisentraut <> 
> wrote:
>> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly.
>> Would that be affected by this?

> I don't think we have real infrastructure for that yet. Neither from the POV 
> of loading several .so's, nor from a symbol visibility. Afaics we'd need a 
> working definition of PGDLLIMPORT which inverts the declspecs. I think Tom 
> just removed the remnants of that.

No, I've not touched the PGDLLIMPORT macros.  I was hoping to, but it
looks like we're not getting there :-(

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to