Tomas Vondra wrote: > So, if I get this right, the proposal is to have 7 animals:
It's your machine, so you decide what you want. I'm only throwing out some ideas. > 1) all branches/locales, frequent builds (every few hours) > magpie - gcc > fulmar - icc > treepie - clang > > 2) single branch/locale, CLOBBER, built once a week > magpie2 - gcc > fulmar2 - icc > treepie - clang > > 3) single branch/locale, recursive CLOBBER, built once a month Check. Not those "2" names though. > I don't particularly mind the number of animals, although I was shooting > for lower number. Consider that if the recursive clobber fails, we don't want that failure to appear "diluted" among many successes of runs using the same animal with non-recursive clobber. > The only question is - should we use 3 animals for the recursive CLOBBER > too? I mean, one for each compiler? I guess it depends how likely we think that a different compiler will change the behavior of the shared invalidation queue. Somebody else would have to answer that. If not, then clearly we need only 5 animals. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
