On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Well, I don't think PostgreSQL needs its own PL. I mean we already have > several (what other database has pl/javascript or pl/python?)
PostgreSQL already *have* it's own PL, it's called PL/pgSQL. > Besides, the idea of this community trying to build its own programming > language... oh lord ;) I would agree it's too much of a challenge to invent a brand new programming language, I agree that's unrealistic, that's why I'm opting to do as much as possible in the existing language, and carefully think about what non-compatible important changes we simply cannot make to PL/pgSQL, as they by definition would break compatibility (which we all agree is not acceptable), but that *would* be possible with PL/pgSQL 2. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
