On 12/23/14, 8:54 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
 > Right now a lot of people just work around this with things like DO blocks, 
but as mentioned elsewhere in the thread that fails for commands that can't be in 
a transaction.

I use "dblink" to solve it. :-)

So... how about instead of solving this only for vacuum we create something 
generic? :) Possibly using Robert's background worker work?
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to