On 12/23/14, 8:49 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Em terça-feira, 23 de dezembro de 2014, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com
On 12/23/14, 8:54 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> Right now a lot of people just work around this with things like DO
blocks, but as mentioned elsewhere in the thread that fails for commands that
can't be in a transaction.
I use "dblink" to solve it. :-)
So... how about instead of solving this only for vacuum we create something
generic? :) Possibly using Robert's background worker work?
But and what about the idea of improve the "--table" option from clients:
vaccumdb and clusterdb?
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: