On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
<i.kurbangal...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Yes, that is because I tried to go with current convention working with
> shmem in Postgres (there are one function that returns the size and
> others that initialize that memory). But I like your suggestion about
> API functions, in that case number of tranches and locks will be known
> during the initialization.

I also want to leave the door open to tranches that are registered
after initialization.  At that point, it's too late to put a tranche
in shared memory, but you can still use DSM.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to