On 09/18/2015 09:25 AM, Adam Brightwell wrote: >>> 1. remove row_security=force >>> 2. remove SECURITY_ROW_LEVEL_DISABLED; make ri_triggers.c subject to >>> policies >>> 3. add DDL-controlled, per-table policy forcing >>> >>> They ought to land in that order. PostgreSQL 9.5 would need at least (1) >>> and >>> (2); would RLS experts find it beneficial for me to take care of those? >> >> That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we >> also need #3. > > Agreed. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
Yes, same here. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
