* Joe Conway (m...@joeconway.com) wrote: > On 09/18/2015 01:07 AM, Noah Misch wrote: > > Great. Robert, does that work for you, too? If so, this sub-thread is > > looking at three patches: > > > > 1. remove row_security=force > > 2. remove SECURITY_ROW_LEVEL_DISABLED; make ri_triggers.c subject to > > policies > > 3. add DDL-controlled, per-table policy forcing > > > > They ought to land in that order. PostgreSQL 9.5 would need at least (1) > > and > > (2); would RLS experts find it beneficial for me to take care of those? > > That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we > also need #3.
Agreed on all of the above. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
