On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:27:13AM -0500, Joe Conway wrote: > On 09/18/2015 09:25 AM, Adam Brightwell wrote: > >>> 1. remove row_security=force > >>> 2. remove SECURITY_ROW_LEVEL_DISABLED; make ri_triggers.c subject to > >>> policies > >>> 3. add DDL-controlled, per-table policy forcing > >>> > >>> They ought to land in that order. PostgreSQL 9.5 would need at least (1) > >>> and > >>> (2); would RLS experts find it beneficial for me to take care of those?
Done. > >> That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we > >> also need #3. Understood. > > Agreed. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help. > > Yes, same here. Thanks. https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items is the big board of things needing work. These items are long-idle: - 84 days: UPSERT on partition - 81 days: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little - 49 days: Arguable RLS security bug, EvalPlanQual() paranoia If you grab one or more of those and figure out what it/they need to get moving again, that would help move us toward 9.5 final. (Don't feel the need to limit yourself to those three, but they are the low-hanging fruit.) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers