On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Joe Conway (m...@joeconway.com) wrote: >> On 09/18/2015 01:07 AM, Noah Misch wrote: >> > Great. Robert, does that work for you, too? If so, this sub-thread is >> > looking at three patches: >> > >> > 1. remove row_security=force >> > 2. remove SECURITY_ROW_LEVEL_DISABLED; make ri_triggers.c subject to >> > policies >> > 3. add DDL-controlled, per-table policy forcing >> > >> > They ought to land in that order. PostgreSQL 9.5 would need at least (1) >> > and >> > (2); would RLS experts find it beneficial for me to take care of those? >> >> That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we >> also need #3. > > Agreed on all of the above.
Well, then, we should get cracking. beta1 is coming soon, and it would be best if this were done before then. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
