On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 03:18:21PM -0400, Adam Brightwell wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
>> >> Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes:
>> >>> There are use cases where row_security=force will be set in production
>> >>> environments, not only in testing.
>> > Noah's suggestion of using a per table attribute
>> > would work -- in fact I like the idea of that better than using the
>> > current GUC.
>> FWIW, I also concur with a per table attribute for this purpose.  In
>> fact, I think I really like the per-table flexibility over an
>> 'all-or-nothing' approach better too.
> Great.  Robert, does that work for you, too?

Yes, that seems like a fine design from my point of view.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to