> pg_upgrade does work, assuming there are no changes to the index or heap > file formats. (However, I now need to update it for schemas.) However, > the last time I worked on it for 7.2, no one was really interested in > testing it, so it never got done. In fact, there was a bug in the > handling of clog or wal files, but I didn't find out about it until long > after 7.2 because no one was using it. > > Is pg_upgrade too hard to run? Is no one really interested in it?
I'm interested. I might look into it a bit more this release cycle as it seems that I don't really have the time for major features like I did last cycle. Still looking for something straightforward to work on... Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
