> pg_upgrade does work, assuming there are no changes to the index or heap
> file formats.  (However, I now need to update it for schemas.)  However,
> the last time I worked on it for 7.2, no one was really interested in
> testing it, so it never got done.  In fact, there was a bug in the
> handling of clog or wal files, but I didn't find out about it until long
> after 7.2 because no one was using it.
> Is pg_upgrade too hard to run?  Is no one really interested in it?

I'm interested.  I might look into it a bit more this release cycle as it
seems that I don't really have the time for major features like I did last

Still looking for something straightforward to work on...


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to