On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> To review (copying Heikki's message):
> 1. Pick a patch from the list at:
> 2. Review it. Test it. Try to break it. Do we want the feature? Any
> weird interactions in corner-cases? Does it have the intended or an
> unintended performance impact?
> 3. Reply on the thread on pgsql-hackers with your findings.
> It is perfectly OK to review a patch that someone else has signed up for as
> reviewer - different people tend to pay attention to different things.
We are close to the end of October, and the numbers are a bit more
encouraging than at the beginning:
Needs review: 27.
Waiting on Author: 12.
Ready for Committer: 5.
Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix
that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those
entries first? Also, to all reviewers and authors, please be sure that
the status of your patch is correctly updated.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: