On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix >>> that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those >>> entries first? >> >> I think at this point we essentially can just move all entries to the >> next. Will do that, and note down which patches haven't gotten any real >> review. > > We are close to the end of the month. Should I move on to do the > vacuuming or are you planning to do it? At this stage, to be fair with > people whose patches are in "waiting on author" state and because > there is not much time until the next CF begins, I propose to remove > all the remaining 43 entries with the same status as currently listed: > Needs review: 26. Waiting on Author: 11. Ready for Committer: 6.
Gosh, that's a lot of stuff that didn't get reviewed. :-( -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
