On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix
>>>> that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those
>>>> entries first?
>>> I think at this point we essentially can just move all entries to the
>>> next. Will do that, and note down which patches haven't gotten any real
>>> review.
>> We are close to the end of the month. Should I move on to do the
>> vacuuming or are you planning to do it? At this stage, to be fair with
>> people whose patches are in "waiting on author" state and because
>> there is not much time until the next CF begins, I propose to remove
>> all the remaining 43 entries with the same status as currently listed:
>> Needs review: 26. Waiting on Author: 11. Ready for Committer: 6.

So, seeing nothing happening I have done the above, opened 2015-11 CF
and closed the current one.

> Gosh, that's a lot of stuff that didn't get reviewed.  :-(


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to