On 2015-10-31 00:42:54 +0100, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > >>>> Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix > >>>> that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those > >>>> entries first? > >>> > >>> I think at this point we essentially can just move all entries to the > >>> next. Will do that, and note down which patches haven't gotten any real > >>> review. > >> > >> We are close to the end of the month. Should I move on to do the > >> vacuuming or are you planning to do it? At this stage, to be fair with > >> people whose patches are in "waiting on author" state and because > >> there is not much time until the next CF begins, I propose to remove > >> all the remaining 43 entries with the same status as currently listed: > >> Needs review: 26. Waiting on Author: 11. Ready for Committer: 6. > > So, seeing nothing happening I have done the above, opened 2015-11 CF > and closed the current one.
You seemingly moved all entries, even the ones which were waiting-on-author for a long while, over? I think we should return items on there with lot of prejudice. Otherwise we're never going to get anywhere. > > Gosh, that's a lot of stuff that didn't get reviewed. :-( > > Yep. Yea, this is probably one of the worst commitfests ever from the point of reviewer participation. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
